Comparatif 2025 : Tricentis vs OpenText vs Mr Suricate - Which automated testing tool should you choose?

By 2025, automated testing will be an essential part of software development cycles. 

Faced with the acceleration of deployments and the growing complexity of web and mobile applications, automated testing tools are multiplying and diversifying, offering a variety of approaches to meet the specific needs of each organization.

In this context, three major players stand out: Tricentis, OpenText and Mr Suricate. Each offers a different vision of test automation.

This article aims to help you make the right decision by analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of these three solutions, so that you can identify the platform best suited to your needs.

Key criteria for choosing an automated test tool in 2025

Choosing the right automated test tool requires an in-depth analysis of several dimensions which have a direct impact on team productivity and the quality of the applications deployed.

1. Ease of use and accessibility of the solution

Code-free automation represents a major revolution today, enabling business teams and non-technical testers to create test scenarios without writing a single line of code.

This approach democratizes access to automated testing and considerably accelerates the implementation of validation campaigns.

2. Ability to integrate with development environments 

Tools must integrate naturally into continuous integration and deployment pipelines, communicate with existing DevOps platforms and adapt to native cloud architectures.

This compatibility guarantees smooth automation throughout the software development lifecycle.

3. Multi-application support and diversity of functional tests

A high-performance tool needs to manage web, mobile and API applications, and even legacy systems, while offering different types of testing: regression testing, end-to-end testing, performance testing and production monitoring.

4. Script adaptability and maintenance

Applications are constantly evolving, and testing needs to keep pace with these changes without requiring a complete overhaul every time an update is made.

5. Interoperability and reversibility

A good tool should allow scenarios to be ported to open source frameworks (Selenium, Playwright...).

Tricentis vs OpenText vs Mr Suricate comparison

Tricentis: For large companies and complex environments

Tricentis Tosca is a powerful platform designed to meet the complex challenges of large enterprises seeking to accelerate their delivery cycles while maintaining impeccable software quality.

The technology that sets Tricentis apart is its template-based automation engine, an approach that is less dependent on the technical details of the user interface.

Theoretically, this architecture makes it possible to create tests that are more resilient in the face of frequent application changes. The tool also offers artificial intelligence capabilities to optimize the creation and maintenance of test scenarios.

Key Tricentis advantages

✅ Very broad functional coverage (UI, API, performance tests, etc.): enables companies to centralize all their tests on a single tool, guaranteeing consistency and global visibility.

✅ Compatible with CI/CD and DevOps: the platform easily integrates with CI/CD pipelines (Jenkins, GitLab, Azure DevOps...), facilitating test automation at every stage of the development cycle.

✅ No-code interface: enables non-technical teams (business or QA) to design test scenarios without writing code.

✅ Use of artificial intelligence to optimize test maintenance: integrates AI functionalities that help keep test scripts up to date despite frequent application evolutions.

Disadvantages of Tricentis

❌ High acquisition cost: remains a premium solution with a significant license cost. This price may act as a brake for SMEs or structures with limited budgets.

❌ Long learning curve: Tricentis' full range of functions requires a considerable amount of time to get to grips with. Extensive training is often required to fully exploit the platform's potential.

❌ Need for a solid infrastructure: the tool is quite demanding in terms of technical resources. A high-performance infrastructure is required to guarantee optimal response times, particularly in contexts with a high volume of tests.

❌ Heavy dependence on the vendor: sometimes limits the flexibility of technical teams, particularly when it comes to customizing or opening up the solution to specific technologies.

*Ideal for large organizations with a strong need for test coverage and trained technical teams.

OpenText: The robust solution for traditional ecosystems

OpenText, with its long-established tools such as UFT One and LoadRunner / Performance Engineering, is a trusted reference for companies with heterogeneous systems, legacy architectures or complex infrastructures.

Its long presence in the market gives it credibility, and its products continue to evolve with the integration of modern capabilities.

Key benefits of OpenText 

✅ Broad compatibility with web, mobile, API and legacy technologies: enables the creation and execution of functional tests covering user interfaces, web services / APIs, and hybrid applications.

✅ Advanced functions with AI for test maintenance: integrates AI functions into its products to facilitate the maintenance of test scripts.

✅ S eamless integration with DevOps tools: supports integration with tools such as Jenkins, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Bamboo, etc. to automate test execution in DevOps chains.

Disadvantages of OpenText 

❌ C omplex, unintuitive interface : the learning curve to fully exploit advanced capabilities is often high.

❌ High costs and rigid pricing structure: OpenText licenses are often expensive and the pricing model complex. Adding advanced modules or scaling up can incur significant additional costs.

❌ Lack of flexibility and agility in the face of rapid change: may require more frequent manual adjustments. The high degree of customization is an asset, but can become a maintenance-related hindrance.

*Ideal for large companies with a varied technical ecosystem and dedicated automation resources.

Mr Suricate : no-code automation for everyone

Mr Suricate offers a modern, intuitive and 100% no-code approach to automated testing.

This French SaaS tool stands out for its ease of use and its ability to make testing accessible to all teams, technical and business alike.

Designed to integrate naturally into DevOps environments, Mr Suricate is aimed at organizations wishing to enhance the quality of their web, mobile and API applications without technical complexity or dependence on expert developers.

Key benefits of Mr Suricate

✅ Easy-to-use no-code interface: allows you to create and maintain test scenarios without writing a single line of code. Actions are recorded via an easy-to-use visual engine, opening up automation to business teams, product owners or customer support.

✅ Real-time monitoring of user paths: offers continuous monitoring of critical paths in production, with real-time alerts as soon as an anomaly is detected.

✅ S eamless CI/CD integration: easily integrates with modern continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) ecosystems, including GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions.

✅ Customer support based in France: support is available in French, with a dedicated Customer Success Manager.

✅ Transparent, fixed pricing: offers clear, monthly, fixed pricing, including support, updates and coaching.

✅ Reversibility plan with open source tools (Selenium, Playwright): it is possible to export test scenarios to open source frameworks such as Selenium or Playwright, if internalization or a strategic change is eventually envisaged.

✅ Security and RGPD compliance: Mr Suricate guarantees data confidentiality thanks to secure execution environments (VPN, dedicated IPs, encryption) and full compliance with RGPD standards.

✅ Production monitoring: Unlike Tricentis and OpenText, Mr Suricate is not limited to the acceptance phase. The tool continuously monitors critical user paths in production, and alerts in real time as soon as a bug impacts the customer experience.

Disadvantages of Mr Suricate 

❌ Solution less suited to highly advanced technical testing (e.g. fat client): primarily designed for web or mobile user interface testing. For highly technical cases, such as thick client applications, complex network tests or embedded systems, it may be necessary to supplement with other, more specialized tools.

❌ C ustomization limitations: its simplified approach may limit the customization of highly advanced test scenarios for more experienced testers looking for additional functionality.

*Ideal for SMEs to large accounts and agile teams looking for a solution that's simple, quick to deploy and scalable.

Synthetic comparison table

Our recommendation

If your priority is agility, ease of implementation and a true DevOps approach, Mr Suricate is an excellent choice.

For more complex or traditional needs, Tricentis or OpenText will remain the benchmarks, provided you have the resources to exploit them.

Test Mr Suricate | A cross-browser, cross-device automated testing solution 

The great added value of Mr Suricate is to combine its SaaS solution with quality service, enabling a non-IT specialist to become a tester in less than a month.

With Mr Suricateyou don't need to know how to code or spend a fortune to make sure your users have a smooth and bug-free browsing experience, no matter how they access it!